Collaborate Disseminate
Christa: Electronic discovery, or e-discovery, has always required some digital forensic skills as litigators prepare to present electronic data at trial. However, as technology evolves, likewise, the skills needed to identify, collect and anal… Continue reading Frontline Managed Services’ Kyle Campbell on DFIR & E-Discovery Skills & Pathways
As digital forensic practitioners, the proper collection of digital evidence in a forensic manner is second nature. In many cases, each of us has collected hundreds or even thousands of pieces of media and managed to keep intact the integrity … … Continue reading Book Review: Forensic Data Collections 2.0
Unique Wire assists service providers, corporations, law firms, and law enforcement agencies with identifying and understanding Digital Intelligence.
Unique Wire, a digital forensics and e-discovery business focused on helping service providers, cor… Continue reading E-Discovery Business Takes New Approach to Collecting and Preparing Digital Evidence to Spur Growth
E-discovery serves as a reliable method for organizations in accumulating, preserving and organizing data for legal and regulatory compliance. However, advancements in technologies such as containers have invoked security and compliance gap into the p… Continue reading E-Discovery in Cloud: Security Issue and Compliance Gaps
Introduction to E-Discovery E-discovery is the procedure by which parties involved in a legal case collect, preserve, review and exchange information in electronic format to use it as an evidence in…
Go on to the site to read the full article
The pos… Continue reading E-Discovery and Computer Forensics – How are They Different?
In today’s Ask the Admin, Russell Smith explains the difference between an in-place hold and a litigation hold in Exchange.
The post Understanding In-Place Hold and Litigation Hold in Exchange appeared first on Petri.
Continue reading Understanding In-Place Hold and Litigation Hold in Exchange
"Plaintiff Sanctioned for Negligence after Third Party Vendor Destroys ESI" from e-Discovery Case Law Update
"In Cyntegra, Inc. v. Idexx Laboratories, Inc. [pdf], CV 06-4170 (C.D. Cal. 2006), U.S. District Court Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, granted the defendant’s motion for an adverse inference instruction as a sanction holding that the plaintiff was negligent and failed its affirmative duty to Continue reading Cloud Data and E-Discovery – Pay your bill or risk sanctions.
"Plaintiff Sanctioned for Negligence after Third Party Vendor Destroys ESI" from e-Discovery Case Law Update
"In Cyntegra, Inc. v. Idexx Laboratories, Inc. [pdf], CV 06-4170 (C.D. Cal. 2006), U.S. District Court Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, granted the defendant’s motion for an adverse inference instruction as a sanction holding that the plaintiff was negligent and failed its affirmative duty to Continue reading Cloud Data and E-Discovery – Pay your bill or risk sanctions.