Election tech vendors say they’re securing their systems. Does anyone believe them?

The last few years have been an awakening for Election Systems & Software. Before 2016, very few people were publicly pressing the company to change the way it handled its cybersecurity practices. Now, the nation’s leading manufacturer of election technology has become a lightning rod for critics. Security experts say the small number of companies that dominate the nation’s election technology market, including ES&S, have failed to acknowledge and remedy vulnerabilities that lie in systems used to hold elections across the country. Once left to obscurity, the entire ecosystem has been called into question since the Russian government was found to have interfered with the 2016 presidential campaign. While there has never been any evidence to suggest that any voting machines were compromised, the Department of Homeland Security and FBI recently issued a memo that all 50 states were at least targeted by Russian intelligence. The peak of the criticism came after the Voting Village exhibition […]

The post Election tech vendors say they’re securing their systems. Does anyone believe them? appeared first on CyberScoop.

Continue reading Election tech vendors say they’re securing their systems. Does anyone believe them?

Voting-machine vendors have some serious questions to answer, senators say

While the security of the 2020 election remains a prominent topic in Washington, a group of Democratic senators is raising alarms about longer-term issues that will resonate after voters are done choosing a president about 20 months from now. The three companies that make most of the voting technology used in the U.S. must be more transparent about their plans to improve their products to meet current expectations about security and performance, says a letter Wednesday by Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and three other top Democrats. In particular, the senators say every machine should reliably produce paper records, and the companies should do far more to upgrade their products. “The integrity of our elections is directly tied to the machines we vote on — the products that you make,” says the letter from Klobuchar, Mark Warner of Virginia, Jack Reed of Rhode Island and Gary Peters of Michigan. “Despite shouldering such a massive responsibility, there has been […]

The post Voting-machine vendors have some serious questions to answer, senators say appeared first on CyberScoop.

Continue reading Voting-machine vendors have some serious questions to answer, senators say

Senators ask voting machine manufacturers if Russia reviews source code

Two Democratic senators sent a letter to U.S. voting machine manufacturers asking the companies if they allow Russian entities to review the source code of their products. Senators Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., and Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., sent the letters to three largest election equipment vendors in the United States: Election Systems & Software, Dominion Voting Systems and Hart Intercivic. The senators said Russian source code review could help that country hack American election technology. Numerous American companies including Cisco, IBM and SAP allow the Russian government to review their source code to comply with the country’s regulations and gain entry into the country’s markets. “Foreign access to critical source code information and sensitive data continues to be an often overlooked vulnerability. Further, if such vulnerabilities are not quickly examined and mitigated, future elections will also remain vulnerable to attack,” the senators wrote. “The 2018 election season is upon us. Primaries have already begun, […]

The post Senators ask voting machine manufacturers if Russia reviews source code appeared first on Cyberscoop.

Continue reading Senators ask voting machine manufacturers if Russia reviews source code