Does defining "a minimum path length" for certification validation have any security benefit?

As you may know, Common Criteria (AKA ISO/IEC15408: A standard for IT Security Evaluation) have provided some security base-line documents named "Protection Profile" for software developers and product manufacturers. Developers a… Continue reading Does defining "a minimum path length" for certification validation have any security benefit?

What problem does "max_path_length" attribute in certificates are going to solve?

I’m trying to understand the purpose of defining pathLenConstraint and max_path_length in RFC5280 (Internet X509 PKI Certificate and CRL Profile):
For pathLenConstraint The above mentioned RFC states:

The pathLenConstraint field is meanin… Continue reading What problem does "max_path_length" attribute in certificates are going to solve?

Can an Intermediate CA extend its "Certificate Key Usage" by issuing a new certificate for itself?

I’m trying to understand the purpose of defining self-issued certificate concept in RFC5280 (Internet X509 PKI Certificate and CRL Profile):
Regarding this concept the RFC states:

This specification covers two classes of certificates:

CA… Continue reading Can an Intermediate CA extend its "Certificate Key Usage" by issuing a new certificate for itself?