Converting a list of ciphers to OpenSSL’s "CIPHER LIST FORMAT" [migrated]

I am using Naviserver’s nsssl module and it expects the list of TLS ciphers to be in OpenSSL’s “CIPHER LIST FORMAT” e.g.

ns_param ciphers “ECDH+AESGCM:DH+AESGCM:ECDH+AES256:DH+AES256:ECDH+AES128:DH+AES:ECDH+3DES:DH+3DES:RSA+AESGCM… Continue reading Converting a list of ciphers to OpenSSL’s "CIPHER LIST FORMAT" [migrated]

Converting a list of ciphers to OpenSSL’s "CIPHER LIST FORMAT" [migrated]

I am using Naviserver’s nsssl module and it expects the list of TLS ciphers to be in OpenSSL’s “CIPHER LIST FORMAT” e.g.

ns_param ciphers “ECDH+AESGCM:DH+AESGCM:ECDH+AES256:DH+AES256:ECDH+AES128:DH+AES:ECDH+3DES:DH+3DES:RSA+AESGCM… Continue reading Converting a list of ciphers to OpenSSL’s "CIPHER LIST FORMAT" [migrated]

If the Lorenz cipher machine was so much more advanced than the Enigma, how was it broken without having a physical machine? [closed]

The Enigma was commercially available before the war, and even during the war, they got their hands on “live” such machines, heavily helping them in breaking the encryption used by the Germans.

The Lorenz was said to be much more secure, … Continue reading If the Lorenz cipher machine was so much more advanced than the Enigma, how was it broken without having a physical machine? [closed]

Why did the national socialists in WW2 not use the far superior "Lorenz" cipher machine instead of the bad "Enigma"?

Basically, the only good thing about the “Enigma” cipher machine was its name. Other than that, it was grossly inferior to the “Lorenz” one, apparently only used by some of the main, top-ranking persons.

If they did have a much stronger c… Continue reading Why did the national socialists in WW2 not use the far superior "Lorenz" cipher machine instead of the bad "Enigma"?