Obscure Wininet.dll Feature? , (Fri, Jan 21st)

The Internet Storm Center relies on a group of Handlers[1] who are volunteers and offer some free time to the community besides our daily job. Sometimes, we share information between us about an incident or a problem that we are facing and ask for help. Indeed, why not request some help from fellow Handlers with broad experience? Yesterday, Bojan was involved in an incident with a customer and came back to us with this question:

Continue reading Obscure Wininet.dll Feature? , (Fri, Jan 21st)→

Posted in Uncategorized

RedLine Stealer Delivered Through FTP, (Thu, Jan 20th)

Here is a piece of malicious Python script that injects a RedLine&#;x26;#;x5b;1&#;x26;#;x5d; stealer into its own process. Process injection is a common attacker&#;x26;#;xe2;&#;x26;#;x80;&#;x26;#;x99;s technique these days (for a long time already). The difference, in this case, is that the payload is delivered through FTP&#;x26;#;x21; It&#;x26;#;xe2;&#;x26;#;x80;&#;x26;#;x99;s pretty unusual because FTP is today less and less used for multiple reasons (lack of encryption by default, complex to filter with those passive/active modes). Support for FTP has even been disabled by default in Chrome starting with version 95&#;x26;#;x21; But&#;x26;#;xc2;&#;x26;#;xa0;FTP remains a common protocol in the IoT/Linux landscape with malware families like Mirai. My honeypots still collect a lot of Mirai samples on FTP servers. I don&#;x26;#;39;t understand why the attacker chose this protocol because, in most corporate environments,&#;x26;#;xc2;&#;x26;#;xa0;FTP is not allowed by default (and should definitely not be&#;x26;#;x21;).

Continue reading RedLine Stealer Delivered Through FTP, (Thu, Jan 20th)→

Posted in Uncategorized

Phishing e-mail with…an advertisement?, (Tue, Jan 18th)

Authors of phishing and malspam messages like to use various techniques to make their creations appear as legitimate as possible in the eyes of the recipients. To this end, they often try to make their messages look like reports generated by security tools[1], responses to previous communication initiated by the recipient[2], or instructions from someone at the recipients organization[3], just to name a few. Most such techniques have been with us for a long time, however, last week I came across one that I don’t believe I’ve ever seen before – inclusion of what may be thought of as an advertisement in the body of the message.

Continue reading Phishing e-mail with…an advertisement?, (Tue, Jan 18th)→

Posted in Uncategorized